Persian Gulf oil: Strait and narrow

With tensions rising between the US and Iran over Tehran’s nuclear programme, attention is turning to the Strait of Hormuz, a vital oil tanker thoroughfare. Markets fear that the narrow stretch of water between the Persian Gulf and Gulf of Oman could be shut to tanker traffic, either due to retaliation by Iran in response to a blanket embargo on its oil exports or as a result of a military conflagration pitting Iran against the US and/or Israel.

Either scenario would rile global energy markets. Around 20% of the world’s traded oil passes through the Strait, so any closure—even for a few days—would push up prices significantly. And it’s not just oil: the Strait is also an important export outlet for liquid natural gas (LNG), with Qatar, the world’s largest LNG supplier, shipping 25% of the world’s LNG through the passage in 2010.

According to the International Energy Agency, just over 15.5m b/d of crude oil and 1.3m b/d of oil products flowed through the Strait of Hormuz between January and October 2011. Around three-quarters of this crude was directed to markets in Asia-Pacific, highlighting the region’s significant dependence on Middle East oil supply compared with North America and Europe. Japan has historically been dependent on Middle East oil, and the two rising economic powers of Asia, China and India, rely heavily on the region for crude oil supply as well.

The nature of the oil market is such that a closure of the Strait would impact on oil-consuming economies globally. However, should there be a series of events that causes the Strait to be closed to outgoing oil tanker traffic, the graph above shows that Asia in particular will suffer collateral damage.

Oil demand: Rising in the East

The year 2013 will be a landmark one for the global oil market. That is when oil consumption from outside the OECD will exceed that of OECD economies for the first time ever, reflecting the locus of energy consumption patterns shifting east. According to EIU forecasts, in 2013 the OECD will consume 45.45m b/d of crude oil, while the rest of the world will consume 46.84m b/d. Between 2009 and 2013, oil demand is set to increase by 7m b/d in non-OECD countries and decrease by 200,000 b/d in the OECD.

China, of course, will be the main driver of non-OECD demand growth, with its oil consumption hitting the 10m b/d mark in 2012 and reaching 10.8m b/d in 2013. In 2013, nearly 25% of global oil demand will come from non-OECD Asian economies, where oil consumption will exceed that in the US. As the Asian region is resource poor when it comes to oil, its import needs will dramatically increase, providing a new opportunity for OPEC producers in the Middle East whose market share in the US, the world’s largest market, is declining. Demand for oil is also growing in the Middle East, however, which will leave fewer barrels available for export.

Shale gas: Boom or glut?

The price of natural gas futures on the New York Mercantile Exchange (Nymex) this week fell to its lowest level in a decade, settling at a paltry US$2.322 per million British thermal units (MMBtu). Gas futures had peaked at nearly US$13.58/MMBtu in the summer of 2008, about the same time that crude oil futures on the Nymex hit a record high of US$147/bbl. But while the price of oil has made a healthy recovery since the 2009 recession, rising to more than US$100/bbl, gas prices have remained in the doldrums (see chart).

A combination of factors explains this. US gas production has been ramping up since 2005 as a result of the “shale gas revolution”, with shale gas now comprising about 25% of total US gas supply. With economic performance still poor, demand for gas has continued to suffer. The mild winter has also depressed consumption. In early January, prices fell below the US$3/MMBtu mark, and they have been in freefall ever since.

But the bear market has not stopped oil and gas firms from making some major acquisitions in the shale gas sector, with the more bullish long-term view in mind. Recent deals by Total and Sinopec, for example, are each worth more than US$2bn. 

Should the gas glut last, and prices remain so low, the industry is also likely to push harder for LNG export capacity to be approved by US federal agencies, letting it take advantage of much higher prices elsewhere, such as in Asia. But the US Department of Energy has warned that this would push domestic prices back up again.

For the time being, however, natural gas market bears are prevailing.

America’s oil demand: End of the affair?

The US oil market has been changing quietly over the last half-decade or so. In 2005, US oil consumption peaked at 20.8m barrels/day (b/d), with the use of motor gasoline contributing nearly half of the total. Since then, each new year saw demand drop. According to the US Energy Information Administration, oil consumption dropped to 18.87m b/d in 2011 (a fall of 9% since 2005), and is forecast to only rise slightly to 19.01m b/d by 2013. Gasoline demand is now in the doldrums at just below 9m b/d, having peaked in 2007 at 9.29m b/d.

Why is this the case? Fuel prices have risen, sales of light trucks have slowed, and tighter fuel economy standards have been introduced. The recent recession also led Americans to drive and fly less than they were previously accustomed to. Demand for residual fuel oil, used for power generation and by heavy industry, is also slipping. Now, refineries are exporting oil products, especially gasoline and distillates (heating oil and diesel), to Latin America, where demand for oil products is growing.

Meanwhile, the Obama administration is discouraging a revival in transport fuel demand as part of its strategy to reduce oil consumption, and thus imports. Last year, the president announced an agreement with automakers to boost fuel economy to 54.5 miles per gallon (mpg) for cars and light-duty trucks by the 2025 model year, building on a previous agreement to increase fuel economy to 35.5 mpg, from 27.5 mpg, by 2016.

Until a few years ago, it seemed that the US’s love affair with petroleum would lead it down an irreversible path of increased dependency on oil imports. Now, signs suggest that Americans may be falling out of love with petroleum.

Mobile telecoms: Messaging is throttled

How long before mobile-phone users can make voice calls and send text messages free of charge? One company boss, who preferred to remain anonymous, told the Financial Times newspaper earlier this week that he expected this to happen in the not-too-distant future. Customers would pay for a bundle of megabytes (or gigabytes), for use with internet and other data services, and get to enjoy the old-fashioned stuff for nothing.

Such a development may seem a radical break with the business models of the past. Voice and texting still account for the bulk of operator revenues, even in markets where data services are flourishing. Yet those services are being hammered from all sides. Joining the well-known antagonists of competition and regulation is now another: data services themselves.

Two reports support the idea, as does recent operational data from some high-profile operators. In a study by Citigroup, analysts correlate the recent take-up of social media services, email and instant messaging—on devices like the iPhone or using Google’s Android operating system—with a tumble in texts sent over the Christmas period.

According to Citigroup, the decline is especially severe in the oldest texting markets, such as Finland. But it is also sharp in countries with high penetration of smartphones and social media tools, notes Strand Consult, a market-research company based in Denmark. In Denmark itself, three of the country’s four network operators witnessed double-digit percentage declines in texting volumes between the first half of 2010 and the first half of 2011 (see chart). Put simply, when communicating through the typed word, Facebook seems a lot more appealing than an operator’s texting service to most smartphone users.

The introduction of unlimited voice calls and texting would mark a complete turnaround from the situation three or four years ago, when smartphone users paid for bundles of voice minutes and texts and got ‘all-you-can-eat’ internet usage thrown in. Because data services gobble up so much network capacity, compared with voice calls and texts, that pricing system was never going to last. Operators will hope the switch has a restorative effect on their margins. But as their oldest services lose relevance, they will look more like dumb pipes than ever before.

Carbon markets: Up in the air

Who would be a carbon trader? They are prey to both precarious multinational talks and crushing economic headwinds. And yet, in terms of volumes traded, it’s not a bad business to be in. Thomson Reuters Point Carbon reports that the global trade in emissions permits grew by 19% in 2011. But there is no ignoring sagging prices; the value of permits dropped dramatically in 2011, thanks largely to the European Union’s Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS), the mainstay of the global carbon market.

Besides weighty demand-side constraints—not least the euro zone’s economic woes—much of the blame for low prices lies with an oversupply of credits, which are set by quotas approved by the European Commission (EC). Around 60% of EU emissions permits are likely to be auctioned next year, strangling off the hitherto plentiful supply of free allowances. But given Europe’s struggles, the EC appears hesitant to radically raise the cost of polluting.

Those designing carbon trading schemes elsewhere—trading in California is due to start in 2013 and in 2015 in Australia—are mindful of Europe’s chequered history with pricing, Point Carbon notes. Hence, a fashion for imposing price floors and ceilings. This even extends to ETS participants: Britain’s government talks of setting a carbon-permit floor price as high as £70 by 2030.

Yet this is an inadequate fix for the political fissures undermining carbon markets. Many investors doubt governments’ resolve to follow through on lofty green goals. Global climate talks are stuttering, while most EU members missed a recent deadline to submit their plans for granting permits to companies, needed so that the EC can set the number of free permits it grants during the next phase of trading. The likely abundance of free carbon credits will neatly reflect a shortfall in political will.

India’s stockmarket: Grand opening

Starting next week, India will allow foreign investors to invest directly in listed companies. Previously, foreigners could gain equity exposure only via mutual funds or other intermediaries.

But just because foreign investors are allowed to invest doesn’t mean that they will. India’s benchmark Sensex index shed 25% last year, while the rupee sank by 17% against the dollar. Over the course of 2011, foreign institutional investors withdrew a net US$358m from Indian equities.

In 2009 and 2010, much better years for Indian shares, net foreign inflows approached US$50bn. By widening the base of investors, India’s policymakers hope to usher in another era of robust foreign inflows. Recent reversals of reforms to foreign ownership limits in the retail and financial industries, however, raise thorny questions about India’s business environment. In this context, political opposition to the liberalisation of India’s stockmarkets is another cause for concern. Despite India’s undeniable growth potential, clear signs of a turnaround in Indian equity performance—and proof of the government’s sincerity in granting greater access to shares—are required before foreign investors will feel comfortable piling back into the country’s markets.

Iran’s oil: Capacity constraints

In November, we discussed Iran’s major oil export markets in the light of rising tensions with the West over Tehran’s nuclear programme. This hostility has contributed significantly to higher oil prices, with Brent crude oil futures settling at around $113/barrel, an increase of 9% since mid-December.

The US and the EU both recently announced tighter restrictions on Iranian oil exports, which provide around 50% of the Islamic Republic’s government income and 80% of its export revenue. An EU ban on Iranian crude oil would hurt Iran more than it would hurt the EU, but the extent of this impact would depend on whether other countries, especially in Asia, co-operate with Western efforts to cut Iranian oil imports.

Any meaningful ban on importing Iranian oil would require replacement from other producers, leaving additional supplies from key exporters like Saudi Arabia putting pressure on spare capacity. The International Energy Agency puts the Opec cartel’s spare capacity at around 3.1m barrels per day (b/d). The majority of this belongs to Saudi Arabia, which has already increased production to 10m b/d, from 9m b/d in mid-2011.

An outright ban on Iranian oil imports by the EU would require about a fifth of Opec’s spare capacity to make up the difference, while a global ban on Iran’s output would soak up around 80% of the cartel’s spare output. Needless to say, both possibilities imply much higher oil prices. For this reason, the last thing a weak global economy needs is for Iran’s relations with the West to pass the point of no return.

Natural disasters: Counting the cost

At some US$380bn, the cost of natural disasters in 2011 set a new record, according to Munich Re. Insured losses, at US$105bn, also registered a nominal all-time high. (Adjusted for inflation, the insured loss in 2011 was narrowly pipped by 2005.)

The earthquake, tsunami and related nuclear crisis in Japan accounted for more than half of the overall disaster bill last year, and around 40% of all insured losses. A second large earthquake in New Zealand, floods in Thailand and a series of severe storms in the US rounded out a “very rare” confluence of natural catastrophes in 2011, according to Munich Re.

Even if last year was exceptional, a general trend towards more severe and unpredictable weather is evident. Over the past three years, the average annual tally of natural catastrophes is up by more than 40% versus the 30-year average. Average insured losses over this period are nearly three times the 30-year trend.

US credit conditions: Cautiously optimistic

Business loans in the US are growing at their fastest rate for three years. Although encouraging, recent data needs to be considered in context.

After nearly two years of decline, November marked the ninth consecutive year-on-year rise in commercial and industrial loans. Lending growth in the third quarter, at a seasonally adjusted annual rate of almost 10%, registered the highest rate since the same quarter in 2008.

Still, the absolute level of business loans is 18% lower than its high in late 2008. And the ratio of banks’ cash holdings to loans remains well above pre-crisis levels. The last time we looked at this ratio, in January, American banks appeared to be opening the taps; the cash-to-loans ratio only briefly tipped above 100% before falling back.

Since then, as the euro debt crisis worsened and volatility reigned, lenders hoarded cash more enthusiastically than ever before. Although credit conditions may be easing, banks are hardly lending freely; lenders are setting aside US$1.16 in cash for every US$1 in business loans. This is down from an all-time high of more than US$1.50 in the summer, but hardly a sign of generosity on the part of loan officers.